Abstract design featuring smooth, curved white lines on a light gray background.

Q1 2025 Commentary: “Steady in the Storm” — What the First Quarter Taught Us, and What Today Reinforces

April 03, 2025

Market sentiment can shift faster than most investors expect. The first quarter of 2025 demonstrated that clearly, and April 3rd reinforced it in real time. A broad new tariff announcement sent markets sharply lower: the Dow dropped 1,679 points, the S&P 500 fell 4.84%, and the Nasdaq fell 5.97% in a single session. Consumer discretionary, energy, and technology took the hardest hits, while consumer staples managed modest gains.

It was a difficult day. It was not a surprising one. Volatility is part of investing, and what matters most is how investors respond when it shows up.

Q1 2025 in Review: From Confidence to Complexity

The year began with momentum. Markets rallied into Inauguration Day, encouraged by expectations of tax cuts, deregulation, and a pro-business policy environment. That optimism faded quickly as policy uncertainty, shifting Fed expectations, and renewed trade fears entered the picture.

By the end of Q1, the scorecard looked like this:

  • S&P 500: down 4.6%
  • Nasdaq: down 10.4%
  • Small caps: down nearly 10%
  • Bonds: up nearly 3%, showing renewed value as a portfolio ballast
  • International developed stocks: up over 7%, particularly in Europe

The quarter illustrated how quickly market narratives can change, and how differently various asset classes behave when they do. The April 3rd selloff compressed months of concern into a single session.

The Tariff Announcement: What Markets Were Reacting To

The newly announced trade initiative included a 10% universal tariff on nearly all U.S. imports effective April 5, targeted tariffs of 54% on China, 24% on Japan, 20% on the EU, and 10% on the UK, with Canada and Mexico exempt at the time of this writing though potentially subject to future actions.

Markets responded by pricing in higher inflation risk, slower global growth, and deeper uncertainty. Treasury yields fell on recession concerns, and key equity sectors pulled back sharply.

Policy-driven market moves of this kind are difficult to anticipate. The actual economic impact of tariff changes on sourcing, pricing, and supply chains plays out over quarters, not days. What markets price in immediately often reflects the range of possible outcomes, not a single forecast about what will actually happen.

Putting the Volatility in Context

With the Nasdaq in correction territory and the S&P 500 approaching that threshold, the natural response is concern. A few data points worth holding alongside the headlines:

The S&P 500 at this point was back to where it had been roughly seven months earlier. That is not comfortable, but it is context. Market corrections of approximately 10% have occurred regularly throughout market history and have historically been followed by recoveries, though the timing and path of those recoveries varies significantly.

Recoveries tend to begin quietly, often when confidence is still low and the headlines are still negative. The investors who capture those recoveries are the ones who stayed invested rather than moving to the sidelines waiting for clarity.

Why Reacting to Volatility Tends to Make Things Worse

The pull toward action during volatile periods is understandable. The historical record on acting on that instinct is not encouraging.

Attempting to time exits and re-entries during volatile periods rarely produces better outcomes than staying invested. Missing a small number of the best market days, many of which occur immediately following the worst days, significantly reduces long-term returns. The expected benefit of getting the timing right is modest. The cost of getting it wrong is substantial.

A financial plan built around long-term goals, diversified across asset classes, and structured with realistic assumptions does not need to be rebuilt every time a difficult quarter or a difficult day arrives. It was designed for exactly this.

What Was Worth Watching After April 3

Several variables were shaping the outlook at the time of publication:

Trade policy response. Whether trading partners would retaliate, negotiate, or accept the new terms was genuinely uncertain and would determine whether the tariff announcement was the beginning of a longer trade conflict or a negotiating position.

Inflation path. Inflation remained elevated, though some models suggested possible easing by summer 2025. Tariffs on imports added an additional variable to that picture.

Valuations. Even after the Q1 and April 3rd declines, broad markets remained approximately 12% above long-term historical valuation averages. That did not mean further declines were inevitable, but it did mean the margin of safety was not extreme.

Sector behavior. Technology and energy led the April 3rd decline while healthcare and consumer staples held up better, reinforcing the value of broad diversification across sectors rather than concentration in the areas that had led during the prior rally.

Frequently Asked Questions

What causes a market correction?

A market correction is generally defined as a decline of 10% or more from a recent peak. Corrections can be triggered by shifts in monetary policy expectations, geopolitical events, policy changes such as tariff announcements, economic data surprises, or changes in investor sentiment. They are a normal feature of market history. Since World War II, corrections have occurred regularly and have historically been followed by recoveries, though the timing varies significantly.

How should investors respond to a sharp single-day market decline?

The evidence consistently supports staying invested rather than moving to cash during sharp declines. Markets tend to recover from policy-driven selloffs, and many of the best single-day returns in market history occur in close proximity to the worst. Investors who exit during declines must then decide when to re-enter, a decision that is extremely difficult to make well. A diversified, long-term financial plan is designed to absorb single-day and single-quarter volatility without requiring a response.

What is the difference between a market correction and a bear market?

A correction is typically defined as a decline of 10% to 20% from a recent peak. A bear market is a decline of 20% or more. Corrections are significantly more common than bear markets and tend to resolve more quickly. At the time of this publication, the Nasdaq had entered correction territory and the S&P 500 was approaching it, but neither had reached bear market levels.

How do tariffs affect investment portfolios?

Tariffs affect portfolios through several channels. They can raise costs for companies that rely on imported inputs, reducing profit margins. They can reduce consumer purchasing power if higher costs are passed through to retail prices. They can slow global trade, affecting revenue for companies with significant international exposure. In the near term, tariff announcements often create uncertainty that itself affects valuations before the economic impact is fully understood.

Why do international stocks sometimes perform better than U.S. stocks during periods of U.S. policy uncertainty?

International diversification provides exposure to different economic cycles, monetary policy environments, and political risks than the U.S. market. During periods when U.S. policy uncertainty is elevated, international markets may be less directly affected. In Q1 2025, European markets outperformed U.S. markets in part because the policy uncertainty was centered on U.S. trade and fiscal decisions. This is one of the reasons broad geographic diversification is a durable component of long-term portfolio construction.

Related Reading


HWM Wealth provides financial planning and investment advisory services. This article reflects market conditions as of April 3, 2025, and is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security.


Subscribe to our Newsletter

Smiling professional woman with brown hair wearing a navy blazer and pearl earrings in a bright office setting

About the Author
Caroline McInerney, CFP®, CBEC®

Founder & CEO, HWM Wealth
Author of The Owner’s Dividend

Caroline works with business owners and high-earning professionals to build personal wealth with the same discipline they apply to their companies. Her work integrates financial planning, tax-aware investment strategy, and long-term generational wealth design.